treacherous_widow: (Yes I know I look good.)
Blackarachnia ([personal profile] treacherous_widow) wrote in [community profile] re_alignment2013-04-21 12:21 am

8th web [Video]

So, now that the committee groups have been announced and we're done murdering each other, I have a few thing that need to be brought to the attention to the rest of you.

[Blackarachnia doesn't do sympathy. Get used to it.]


First, I'm on the bureaucracy group and  that means I need to talk to the other person on the list. A human child named Miko. Which also brings me to the next order of business. It seems that some people have expressed concerns about a few members of  the committee  and it's up to me to arrange a vote or two to deal with the issues..

First,  whether or not  human children should be allowed on the committee. I just want a yes or a no. I don't care for your reasons. I just need a yes or a no from everyone.  If you don't vote, whatever. You're choice.

Second, there have been concerns about Tarn being on the committee. Again, simple vote. Yes or No. I don't care about your reason.If you're worried, just make your vote private.  Whatever. I'm just the person arranging the votes on things brought up to me. It's  your job to decide.

Otherwise, lets try not to slag each other for awhile.

[Locked to Liege Maximo]

....I think I'm going to be needing that upgrade soon.

pendragon: (sprite ♔ armor / frown)

( video )

[personal profile] pendragon 2013-04-21 05:45 am (UTC)(link)
What is a "human child" considered? Up to what age are they a child? I think this designation should be made first. Depending on the age group, a few years can matter a significant amount.

[ Saber figures an eighteen year old would be much capable than a sixteen year old, usually, but.. ]

And I agree Tarn should not be on the committee. With how many people are bringing up previous concerns with him, it is not something we should ignore.

(no subject)

[personal profile] pendragon - 2013-04-21 05:55 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] pendragon - 2013-04-21 06:04 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] pendragon - 2013-04-21 06:37 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] pendragon - 2013-04-21 20:19 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] pendragon - 2013-04-21 21:05 (UTC) - Expand
mccrane: (Back--just turned away)

[personal profile] mccrane 2013-04-21 06:23 am (UTC)(link)
I understand the concern.

My vote is yes for children over 12, and no for Tarn.

[Considering he's been talking with Pharma, it worries him.]
rednotbluethx: DOESN'T MATTER HAHA (Default)

[video]

[personal profile] rednotbluethx 2013-04-21 09:05 am (UTC)(link)
Yes, keep Tarn! No, execute the kids! Er, fire the kids.

[video]

[personal profile] rednotbluethx - 2013-04-23 03:19 (UTC) - Expand

[video]

[personal profile] rednotbluethx - 2013-04-23 03:40 (UTC) - Expand

[Video]

[personal profile] furryfarkinfiend 2013-04-21 11:47 am (UTC)(link)
Kids might as well learn some farkin' time, so I say let them on.

As for that Tarn guy...No farkin' way.

[Rocket thinks everyone's being stupid for letting the guy on the committee, considering the things he's heard about him.]
raceme: (Brb writting your name in the Death Note)

[personal profile] raceme 2013-04-21 02:18 pm (UTC)(link)
Congrats for your new position, Blackarachnia.

Like McCrane, my vote is 'yes' for organics over 12 years old and 'no' for Tarn.

(no subject)

[personal profile] raceme - 2013-04-21 21:12 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] raceme - 2013-04-21 23:33 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] raceme - 2013-04-22 23:42 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] raceme - 2013-04-27 13:17 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] raceme - 2013-05-01 13:02 (UTC) - Expand
deadlydoctor: (Things are getting interesting.)

[locked | Unhackable]

[personal profile] deadlydoctor 2013-04-21 02:21 pm (UTC)(link)
There's nothing more attractive than a smart lady in charge.

I rather not have an immature organic takign important decisions so my vote is NO for Miko. [He has other reason to say no, but let's go with 'immature' for now.]

I prefer not to vote at all about the issue with Tarn.

[locked | Unhackable]

[personal profile] deadlydoctor - 2013-04-21 20:46 (UTC) - Expand

[locked | Unhackable]

[personal profile] deadlydoctor - 2013-04-21 23:55 (UTC) - Expand

[locked | Unhackable]

[personal profile] deadlydoctor - 2013-04-24 21:37 (UTC) - Expand

[locked | Unhackable]

[personal profile] deadlydoctor - 2013-05-02 23:17 (UTC) - Expand
neverputincharge: (Annoying scrap brain)

[Video]

[personal profile] neverputincharge 2013-04-21 08:57 pm (UTC)(link)
Since Miko's my kid, I dunno if it'd be fair fer me ta vote for her ta stay or go.

As for Tarn, I don't know him personally, but from what I heard, I gotta vote no for him.

[Video]

[personal profile] neverputincharge - 2013-04-21 21:42 (UTC) - Expand

[Video]

[personal profile] neverputincharge - 2013-04-25 04:53 (UTC) - Expand
fun_police: ((prewar) theyve ordered us to keep the b)

[video]

[personal profile] fun_police 2013-04-22 02:13 am (UTC)(link)
No for children, and No for Tarn.

[He's trying real hard to keep a straight face while he says this because really?]

[Really. If any of these two get a yes, he'll..]

[Well. He can't complain if he doesn't vote.]
symmetriphiliac: (pic#5882600)

[Video]

[personal profile] symmetriphiliac 2013-04-22 03:40 am (UTC)(link)
It would be foolish to discount an individual based solely on their age. If someone is qualified and able to help, they should be allowed to.
pendragon: (sprite ♔ armor / disappointed)

( not actually responding. )

[personal profile] pendragon 2013-04-22 03:49 am (UTC)(link)
[ It's not like Saber to eavesdrop on conversations, but she is quite interested in the votes people have for the age requirement.

So have Saber listening and watching Kid's statement, and a slight widening of her eyes.

This statement of Kid's is very true, too; however, the question was of age, not really of qualification. But, if one is on the law committee, they would be considered qualified already..

The knight won't retract her vote, but she's aware that the count is against the 'no' already. ..After all, hadn't she lead a country from the ages of fourteen to twenty-four, herself? ]


(( OOC: Sorry for spamming up your thread, Kid-mun, but this post was exactly what I was looking for to make Saber realize what she was saying in her vote! ))

(no subject)

[personal profile] symmetriphiliac - 2013-04-22 03:53 (UTC) - Expand

[Video]

[personal profile] symmetriphiliac - 2013-04-22 05:39 (UTC) - Expand

[Video]

[personal profile] symmetriphiliac - 2013-04-22 05:48 (UTC) - Expand

[Video]

[personal profile] symmetriphiliac - 2013-04-22 22:48 (UTC) - Expand

[Video]

[personal profile] symmetriphiliac - 2013-04-23 16:35 (UTC) - Expand

[Video] 1/3

[personal profile] symmetriphiliac - 2013-04-30 16:38 (UTC) - Expand

[Video] 2/3

[personal profile] symmetriphiliac - 2013-04-30 16:39 (UTC) - Expand

[Video] 3/3

[personal profile] symmetriphiliac - 2013-04-30 16:40 (UTC) - Expand
tearsofsteel: (Weltschmertz)

[Video]

[personal profile] tearsofsteel 2013-04-22 07:21 pm (UTC)(link)
Already have a problem with Kay as is.

In my opinion? I don't think kids should be involved with any of the committee business.

Mark me up for a no on Tarn as well.

[Albert does not mince words.]
needlefingers: (Okay)

[personal profile] needlefingers 2013-04-22 11:10 pm (UTC)(link)
Hmm, well I'm not on the committee but...

I'd vote no for the children and yes for Tarn.

[No don't ask him about the Yes.]
flashdrive: (ANGRY FLASH DRIVE)

THREADJACKING IF THIS IS OKAY

[personal profile] flashdrive 2013-04-22 11:13 pm (UTC)(link)
...Chromedome.

I'm giving you five seconds to explain.

(no subject)

[personal profile] needlefingers - 2013-04-22 23:20 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] flashdrive - 2013-04-22 23:23 (UTC) - Expand

Action it up

[personal profile] flashdrive - 2013-04-22 23:44 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] needlefingers - 2013-04-22 23:47 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] flashdrive - 2013-04-23 06:06 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] needlefingers - 2013-04-23 06:22 (UTC) - Expand

[not a comment but...]

[personal profile] raceme - 2013-04-22 23:19 (UTC) - Expand

[not a comment but...]

[personal profile] needlefingers - 2013-04-22 23:44 (UTC) - Expand

[not a comment]

[personal profile] raceme - 2013-04-23 01:17 (UTC) - Expand

[not a comment]

[personal profile] needlefingers - 2013-04-23 06:24 (UTC) - Expand

[not a comment]

[personal profile] raceme - 2013-04-23 21:57 (UTC) - Expand

[Private]

[personal profile] needlefingers - 2013-04-22 23:23 (UTC) - Expand

[Private]

[personal profile] fun_police - 2013-04-22 23:26 (UTC) - Expand

[Private/Text]

[personal profile] needlefingers - 2013-04-22 23:38 (UTC) - Expand

[Video] --> [Ackshon]

[personal profile] fun_police - 2013-04-23 00:04 (UTC) - Expand

[Action]

[personal profile] needlefingers - 2013-04-23 00:10 (UTC) - Expand

[Action]

[personal profile] fun_police - 2013-04-23 00:18 (UTC) - Expand

[Action]

[personal profile] needlefingers - 2013-04-23 00:23 (UTC) - Expand

[Action]

[personal profile] fun_police - 2013-04-23 00:33 (UTC) - Expand

[Action]

[personal profile] needlefingers - 2013-04-23 00:39 (UTC) - Expand

[Action]

[personal profile] fun_police - 2013-04-24 13:09 (UTC) - Expand

[Action]

[personal profile] needlefingers - 2013-04-25 06:16 (UTC) - Expand
aerospacecommander: (starscream 2)

[personal profile] aerospacecommander 2013-04-22 11:49 pm (UTC)(link)
Why don't we just let the committee be run by sea slugs?

(no subject)

[personal profile] aerospacecommander - 2013-04-23 02:21 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] aerospacecommander - 2013-04-23 05:00 (UTC) - Expand
namesnotprowl: (Think Think...)

audio;

[personal profile] namesnotprowl 2013-04-22 11:50 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes t'the kid. She's clever and at least deserves a chance, if she's willing.

No to Tarn. [He doesn't know the mech personally, but with how scared Ambulon was about that Wikireader getting into his hands... he seems like bad news.]

audio;

[personal profile] namesnotprowl - 2013-04-23 01:49 (UTC) - Expand

audio;

[personal profile] namesnotprowl - 2013-04-23 03:26 (UTC) - Expand
4_toteachus: (I like that)

[personal profile] 4_toteachus 2013-04-23 02:18 am (UTC)(link)
I have no particular opinion on human children, so I will vote yes. For Tarn, I would like to vote yes too.

Mind if I ask how one gets on the Law Committee?
rstlsslegsyndrm: JESUS CHRIST THIS FLOPPY DISK IS HUGE (Default)

[audio]

[personal profile] rstlsslegsyndrm 2013-04-23 02:55 am (UTC)(link)
'Yes' for the kids, I suppose, absolute 'no' for Tarn.
uknowuwantmebaby: (Crow here for the Oscars)

[Audio]

[personal profile] uknowuwantmebaby 2013-04-23 03:28 am (UTC)(link)
As his public relations manager, I will have to vote yes for Jean Claude Van Tarn.

[Audio]

[personal profile] uknowuwantmebaby - 2013-04-23 03:47 (UTC) - Expand
heytheresugarbot: (Ya hear that?)

[Video]

[personal profile] heytheresugarbot 2013-04-23 04:43 am (UTC)(link)
Didn' know you were so important Sugarbot!

[Oh hey it's this guy.]

You sound mighty lovely when yer bein' all authoritative and stuff!

[Video]

[personal profile] heytheresugarbot - 2013-04-23 04:53 (UTC) - Expand

[Video]

[personal profile] heytheresugarbot - 2013-04-23 05:03 (UTC) - Expand

[Video]

[personal profile] heytheresugarbot - 2013-04-23 05:18 (UTC) - Expand

[Video]

[personal profile] heytheresugarbot - 2013-04-23 05:42 (UTC) - Expand
dirge: (Oho really now?)

[personal profile] dirge 2013-04-23 04:48 am (UTC)(link)
I vote for children to be eaten. And Tarn to be on the law thing. [See? He's a good minion.]
songofmypeople: mine (Default)

Private

[personal profile] songofmypeople 2013-04-23 06:45 am (UTC)(link)
The organics get a 'no' from me.

As for my position on my position, well, I imagine you know how I'll cast that.
ichooseboth: (ROBOTS LOVE 'MERICA :V)

[Video]

[personal profile] ichooseboth 2013-04-23 11:45 pm (UTC)(link)
[Don't want reasons? When has anything like that stopped Optimus Prime from giving a speech?]

I have no issues with the human children's involvement. They had to fill out the same application as the rest of us and should have a chance to prove their worth.

And while I would prefer not to be 'biased', given the general reactions- [Not to mention his own intelligence from home;] -Tarn's involvement in this committee seems increasingly ill-advised.

'Yes' for the children and 'no' for Tarn.
adamndoctor: by breakthesky89 @ lj (business!)

[video]

[personal profile] adamndoctor 2013-04-24 09:28 am (UTC)(link)
'No' for the kids, and 'no' for Tarn. [Short, sweet, and simple.]
skidaddle: (anger10-serious pout)

[personal profile] skidaddle 2013-04-25 04:33 am (UTC)(link)
Okay.

I'm going to go out on a limb here.

'Yes' for everyone.

[He gets the idea for caution...he does! But he wants to see how they do in office before kicking them out of it.]
heavymetalgenkigirl: (Default)

[personal profile] heavymetalgenkigirl 2013-04-25 06:05 am (UTC)(link)
Hey, you want to speak to me?

While I may not be allowed to vote for this because of who I am specifically, but I think anyone who is accepted by application should be allowed on the committee, human children or even people who have had concerns expressed about them, until they show they can't or don't do the job needed.

(no subject)

[personal profile] heavymetalgenkigirl - 2013-05-06 09:31 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] heavymetalgenkigirl - 2013-05-12 08:11 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] heavymetalgenkigirl - 2013-05-14 07:56 (UTC) - Expand

[Video]

[personal profile] heavymetalgenkigirl - 2013-05-15 06:34 (UTC) - Expand

[Video]

[personal profile] heavymetalgenkigirl - 2013-06-01 20:40 (UTC) - Expand
heavymetalgenkigirl: (Chillaxing)

Private Message

[personal profile] heavymetalgenkigirl 2013-05-14 08:02 am (UTC)(link)
((OOC I hope it's alright if I just pop this in here rather than starting something new now.))

So I didn't know what to do about ones where people didn't exactly answer, so I left out the score on them, cause I don't want to do it wrong by influencing the votes.

For the kids on the committee issue I got nine in favor and six disagreeing.

For Tarn on the committee issue I got eight in favor and twelve disagreeing.

Re: Private Message

[personal profile] heavymetalgenkigirl - 2013-05-15 06:19 (UTC) - Expand