Miko Nakadai (
heavymetalgenkigirl) wrote in
re_alignment2013-09-07 10:50 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Entry tags:
[text] Track 10 remix
So after some review the vote on if we should continue with the process of electing an Overseer will be extended another 3 days, to make time for those who gave the greatest sacrifices to apprehend the recent suspects.
Please remember to vote for if we should continue with the efforts to elect an Overseer for Haven's community.
Again, locked comments for votes to provide blind voting.
Yes to continue with electing an Overseer, no to end the efforts to elect an Overseer.
Thank you.
Please remember to vote for if we should continue with the efforts to elect an Overseer for Haven's community.
Again, locked comments for votes to provide blind voting.
Yes to continue with electing an Overseer, no to end the efforts to elect an Overseer.
Thank you.
locked
locked
locked
How you been doing?
locked
I've been... fine, I'm doing fine.
locked
That doesn't sounds very convincing. It's something wrong?
Re: locked
Re: locked
[Locked]
Maybe their background or something should be checked too. So we don't wind up with somebody like Tarn as an Overseer.
[Sure they get a clean slate, but evidently people willing to take advantage of having a clean slate.]
[Locked]
[Locked]
[Locked]
[Locked]
[video]
And we definitely should hear from the candidates. Not only background checks, but their ideals, their goals, their proposals, the laws they wish to pass. I ain't votin' blindly for just anyone with a nice smile and charming voice.
[video]
Yeah, I think a suggestion of having a lot of 'get to know the candidate' stuff should happen, so people really know who they are voting for.