aerospacecommander: (starscream 31)
Starscream ([personal profile] aerospacecommander) wrote in [community profile] re_alignment2013-03-08 12:54 am

[video][private to the law committee]



All right, it seems as though this group has been slacking a bit in our responsibilities. We need to do something about that since I believe we have representations for all of our glorious hosts. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.

With that said, I have another matter I'd like to bring to the table: the mech Dead End.

As you probably are aware, he has made public his cannibalistic nature. When I confronted him, he admitted to being a threat, but refuses to do anything about it. I don't know about you, but after the allegations of him possibly sneaking into rooms, I don't think this is something we should take lightly.

I'm not suggesting termination --

[As that would not work anyway.]

Or anything related, but we do need precautions before something escalates. If not from Dead End himself, from another going after him.

I propose something along the lines of an internal tracker, a limited boundary he must stay in, and his own personal "baby sitter" so to speak. If he voluntarily complies and doesn't try to eat anyone, this could be eventually lifted. If he violates the rules, then harsher measures can be taken.

I welcome any other suggestions, but I still feel we must act before someone is hurt. I assume being eaten alive isn't a pleasant experience.
ichooseboth: (close up thinking)

[Video]

[personal profile] ichooseboth 2013-03-10 05:50 am (UTC)(link)
True, but we can at least try. It could certainly earn him some points with those that are wary.

And honestly, I don't have the slightest idea. I can't say I've ever heard of anything like this before. Perhaps a medic might have more insight.
ichooseboth: (Could this mask get any bigger?)

[Video]

[personal profile] ichooseboth 2013-03-13 07:14 am (UTC)(link)
A possible option. But I suppose we will have to get the details directly from the mech in question before we can actually attempt anything.
ichooseboth: (Sideglance)

[Video]

[personal profile] ichooseboth 2013-03-19 09:26 am (UTC)(link)
[A sigh.]

If I must. But I have interacted with someone fitting his description before. If it is the same mech, I highly doubt the suggestion would be very appreciated, coming from me.
ichooseboth: (close up thinking)

[Video]

[personal profile] ichooseboth 2013-03-27 07:04 am (UTC)(link)
Hn. He previously expressed a great deal of doubt in an Autobot's ability to remain unbiased.

A Decepticon would likely be best. Or a united front from both, though that could make any mech feel backed into a corner.
ichooseboth: (Stare out - dark city)

[Video]

[personal profile] ichooseboth 2013-04-07 02:17 am (UTC)(link)
Hmm. I am uncertain. I never got a look at his glyph.
ichooseboth: (Default)

[Video]

[personal profile] ichooseboth 2013-04-13 10:06 am (UTC)(link)
...Unfortunately, I don't always have all of the answers, Starscream.

[Dryly.]
ichooseboth: (Blue stare)

[Video]

[personal profile] ichooseboth 2013-04-18 08:16 pm (UTC)(link)
[Brow raise.]

I hardly go around declaring my infallibility or any sort of similar nonsense.
ichooseboth: (um. hi?)

[Video]

[personal profile] ichooseboth 2013-04-24 02:11 am (UTC)(link)
...I haven't seen any examples of that.

[Thankfully. How awkward.]

But if they have been, I certainly haven't endorsed it.
ichooseboth: (...Right)

[Video]

[personal profile] ichooseboth 2013-05-22 04:31 am (UTC)(link)
...Not really.

[The amount of faith and affection his 'bots sometimes have for him can be...awkward.

Touching. But awkward. Like right now.]
ichooseboth: (Sideglance)

[Video]

[personal profile] ichooseboth 2013-06-09 07:39 am (UTC)(link)
...I am not surprised in the least, honestly.